BACK TO HUB
Technical

Root Cause Analysis (8D): RubberQ’s Process for Resolving Quality Deviations.

Root Cause Analysis (8D): RubberQ’s Process for Resolving Quality Deviations.

Share this article

Share this technical note with your engineering team.

Root Cause Analysis (8D): RubberQ’s Process for Resolving Quality Deviations

Problem Statement

A client reported premature failure of EPDM gaskets in a high-temperature coolant system. The gaskets exhibited excessive compression set (>50%) after 500 hours at 150°C, leading to leakage. The root cause was traced to inadequate polymer formulation and improper curing.

Material Science Analysis

EPDM rubber typically performs well in coolant systems due to its resistance to water and steam. However, standard EPDM formulations degrade under prolonged exposure to temperatures above 120°C. The failure occurred due to insufficient crosslinking density and low ethylene content, which reduced thermal stability. RubberQ’s custom EPDM compound addresses this by optimizing ethylene-to-propylene ratio and incorporating peroxide curing agents for enhanced crosslinking.

Technical Specs

  • Shore A Hardness: 70 ± 5
  • Tensile Strength: 12 MPa
  • Elongation at Break: 300%
  • Temperature Range: -40°C to 160°C
  • Compression Set (22 hrs @ 150°C): <30%

Material Comparison

Parameter Custom EPDM Standard EPDM FKM
Shore A Hardness 70 ± 5 65 ± 5 75 ± 5
Tensile Strength (MPa) 12 10 15
Elongation at Break (%) 300 250 200
Temperature Range (°C) -40 to 160 -40 to 120 -20 to 200
Compression Set (%) <30 >50 <20

Standard Compliance

RubberQ adheres to IATF 16949 standards for batch traceability and process control. Each production batch undergoes rigorous testing per ASTM D2000 and ISO 3601 specifications. Documentation includes PPAP submissions, material certifications, and detailed process flow charts to ensure compliance and reproducibility.

CTA

For custom material compound development or IATF 16949 documentation, consult RubberQ’s engineering department.

Share this article

Share this technical note with your engineering team.

Subscribe to Technical Updates

Receive new material insights and engineering case notes directly by email.

Related Articles

Apr 05, 2026

Liquid Silicone Rubber (LSR) Tooling: Why Initial Investment Pays Off in Precision.

Liquid Silicone Rubber (LSR) Tooling: Why Initial Investment Pays Off in Precision Problem Statement High-cycle manufacturing of precision components, such as EV battery seals and AI server gaskets, demands materials with exceptional dimensional stability and chemical resistance. Traditional elastomers like EPDM and NBR often fail under extreme thermal cycling and aggressive chemical exposure, leading to [&hellip;]

Read article

Apr 05, 2026

High-Tonnage Vulcanization: Managing Large-Scale Industrial Rubber Components.

High-Tonnage Vulcanization: Managing Large-Scale Industrial Rubber Components Problem Statement Large-scale industrial rubber components, such as conveyor belts and hydraulic seals, face premature failure under high-tonnage vulcanization. Common issues include chemical degradation at temperatures exceeding 200°C and compression set failure during high-pressure cycles. Material Science Analysis Standard EPDM polymers fail under extreme heat due to their [&hellip;]

Read article

Apr 05, 2026

Commercial Aircraft Interiors: Meeting Smoke and Toxicity Standards (FST).

Commercial Aircraft Interiors: Meeting Smoke and Toxicity Standards (FST) Problem Statement Polymer components in aircraft interiors must pass FAR 25.853 flammability tests while maintaining mechanical performance. Standard EPDM fails at 180°C with toxic smoke emission (HCN >100 ppm). Material Science Analysis Chloroprene rubber (CR) releases HCl gas during combustion. Fluorosilicone (FVMQ) provides superior thermal stability [&hellip;]

Read article

Need technical consultation?

Our engineering team can help apply these material insights to your specific project.

REQUEST A QUOTE