ハブに戻る
技術

Stress Relaxation: How it differs from Compression Set.

Stress Relaxation: How it differs from Compression Set.

この記事を共有

この技術記事をエンジニアチームへ共有できます。

Stress Relaxation vs. Compression Set: Root Cause Analysis for High-Temperature Seals

Problem Statement

Hydraulic seals in EV battery cooling systems failed after 500 hours at 175°C. Initial diagnosis suggested compression set failure, but SEM imaging revealed polymer chain scission—a stress relaxation mechanism.

Material Science Analysis

  • FKM (Standard Grade): Loses 40% sealing force at 150°C due to backbone depolymerization. Fluorine content below 66% accelerates degradation.
  • RubberQ’s Custom FKM-70: 70% fluorine, peroxide-cured. Maintains 85% stress retention at 200°C via crosslink density optimization (ASTM D6147).

Technical Specifications

Parameter FKM-70 (RubberQ) Standard FKM HNBR
Shore A Hardness 75 ±2 75 ±5 80 ±3
Tensile Strength (MPa) 22.4 18.7 25.1
Elongation at Break (%) 210 250 190
Compression Set (22h @ 200°C) 12% 35% 18%
Stress Relaxation (500h @ 175°C) 15% force loss 60% force loss 25% force loss

Key Differentiators

  • Stress Relaxation: Time-dependent decrease in sealing force under constant strain (ASTM D6147). Governed by polymer chain mobility.
  • Compression Set: Permanent deformation after force removal. Indicates irreversible network breakdown (ASTM D395).

IATF 16949 Process Controls

Every batch undergoes:

  • FTIR spectroscopy for fluorine content verification (±1%)
  • Rheometer testing for cure kinetics (t90 ±3 seconds)
  • Post-cure oven profiling (ISO 188, Method B)

For custom material compound development or IATF 16949 documentation, consult RubberQ’s engineering department.

この記事を共有

この技術記事をエンジニアチームへ共有できます。

技術アップデートを購読

材料知見とエンジニアリング事例をメールで受け取れます。

関連記事

2026年4月05日

Liquid Silicone Rubber (LSR) Tooling: Why Initial Investment Pays Off in Precision.

Liquid Silicone Rubber (LSR) Tooling: Why Initial Investment Pays Off in Precision Problem Statement High-cycle manufacturing of precision components, such as EV battery seals and AI server gaskets, demands materials with exceptional dimensional stability and chemical resistance. Traditional elastomers like EPDM and NBR often fail under extreme thermal cycling and aggressive chemical exposure, leading to […]

記事を読む

2026年4月05日

High-Tonnage Vulcanization: Managing Large-Scale Industrial Rubber Components.

High-Tonnage Vulcanization: Managing Large-Scale Industrial Rubber Components Problem Statement Large-scale industrial rubber components, such as conveyor belts and hydraulic seals, face premature failure under high-tonnage vulcanization. Common issues include chemical degradation at temperatures exceeding 200°C and compression set failure during high-pressure cycles. Material Science Analysis Standard EPDM polymers fail under extreme heat due to their […]

記事を読む

2026年4月05日

Commercial Aircraft Interiors: Meeting Smoke and Toxicity Standards (FST).

Commercial Aircraft Interiors: Meeting Smoke and Toxicity Standards (FST) Problem Statement Polymer components in aircraft interiors must pass FAR 25.853 flammability tests while maintaining mechanical performance. Standard EPDM fails at 180°C with toxic smoke emission (HCN >100 ppm). Material Science Analysis Chloroprene rubber (CR) releases HCl gas during combustion. Fluorosilicone (FVMQ) provides superior thermal stability […]

記事を読む

技術相談が必要ですか?

当社のエンジニアリングチームが、これらの材料インサイトをお客様の特定のプロジェクトに適用するお手伝いをします。

見積もり依頼